


I admire the time that someone took to compete all of the crewelwork flowers, leaves and stems on both pieces. I find it hard to believe that someone would have stitched the scalloped edges by hand, although I think they may have. I wonder if perhaps the capelet was purchased from a store, while the dress was completed by hand to coordinate with it. Or was the skirt of the dress stitched from a piece of wool that already had the finished edge?
The interior tells more about how this dress was made. The seam attaching the skirt and bodice seems to have been hand-basted with wide stitches before being sewn in place. The seam leaves a raw edge that does not appear to have been finished. There is so much tiny stitching detail on this dress, including the finely turned under and stitched neck and armhole edges, surely the main construction was done by machine.
Both of the skirt's side seams are sewn with a quarter-inch wide brown selvedge. I measure from seam to seam, and find that each piece of fabric used to make this skirt is just under 22 inches wide. That's a few inches narrower than our standard fabric widths today. These side seams were stitched first, before the bottom edge was completed. So, it's likely that the same person made the complete dress, including the bottom embroidery.
As I look at the little dress now back on a hanger, I notice a few tiny holes and weak places in the fabric. It makes me sad, and I wonder if we stressed the fabric too much. It's still in pretty good shape for a garment that's a hundred years old. I'm glad we tried it on just this once.
What a treasure! Thanks for sharing this.
ReplyDelete